Comments on: Stupidity you’ll hear at conferences

By: Admin

Admin — Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:47:00 +0000

I giggled in public as I read this! Here is some non BS:

Stop worrying about numbers in keyword research. Aim for multiple keywords in a post and look at your analytics to guide you into niches that are open. Make more posts into that topic.

By: side effects

side effects — Tue, 10 May 2011 06:59:00 +0000

What is needed is detail. take one small part of the seo process and talk about that in great detail, dont waste my time spitting out the same list of requirements/process headlines without giving any real information on how to impliment any of the topics being waffled on about.

By: Lauryn Doll Baby

Lauryn Doll Baby — Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:51:00 +0000

“252 links is what you need to rank #1 on Google.”
- Saw this in a conference video. I had to be physically restrained from punching my monitor in an effort to make. the. pain. go. away.

——

Bwahahahah!!!! This is hilarious. I love this blog.

By: Griffnut

Griffnut — Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:57:00 +0000

Finally a no b.s. site,
There are only so many 1′st page search results, yet millions of people think that they can figure out the secret to achieving top ranking. And they think spending some money on some trade secrets will help them.All bullshit, but it drives the internet marketing craze.
I also checked out seobullshit.com on compete.com, you seemed to have leveled off to a 15k to 20k unique visitors per month, not bad SEO ha

By: seo conference

seo conference — Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:05:00 +0000

Hi… that was great stuff.. I really like reading on this subject Could you tell me more on that… I love to explore

By: The SEOBS Questions Supreme Motherload | SEO Bullshit

The SEOBS Questions Supreme Motherload | SEO Bullshit — Sat, 15 May 2010 04:16:27 +0000

[...] a sites pagerank? Or does it just help to avoid confusion within SERPs?” Everyone knows that rel=”cannon” is the preferred method of this attribute. What an idiot! and the number one dumbass question [...]

By: Garry Egan

Garry Egan — Mon, 03 May 2010 16:35:03 +0000

"Experimental results on two SMART sub-collections and a TREC dataset show that LLSR effectively improves the ranking performance compared with the classical LSI algorithm and ranking without subspace learning."

http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10....

By: BullS

BullS — Sun, 02 May 2010 05:31:01 +0000

Excellent —that how BS work in the world of SEO
bullshitSEO and BullWebsites dot com and BullShitDomains

By: The Domain Naming Dude

The Domain Naming Dude — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:30:53 +0000

Funny article. But I don't think there is any hope of this changing for two reasons:

1. No barrier to entry. Anyone can call themselves and SEO expert.
2. SEO is so fucking simple (not to do well, I'm talking about the fundamentals)

I don't even know why they have conferences. What is their to talk about? If you've been in the game for a while and done even the most basic research and experimentations you should pretty much know what to do. There is simply not that much to discuss. So if you have a conference about a subject where you can have someone explain the fundamentals in a half and hour and has no barrier to entry, then there's no where to go except the bullshit route. I imagine a conference about making pancakes or tying your shoe would have the same problems.

By: mark rushworth

mark rushworth — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:42:26 +0000

the thing that absolutely drives me up the wall is people who present and in real terms tell you absolutely nothing… Ive been privy to some big names in search doing presentations and i have to day that all bar one talk absolute rubbish. What is needed is detail. take one small part of the seo process and talk about that in great detail, dont waste my time spitting out the same list of requirements/process headlines without giving any real information on how to impliment any of the topics being waffled on about.